December 6, 2008
I was asked at a dinner party why I had not made a comment about the new ‘Anglican’ province being formed in
At the same time, I hope that my predictions will not come to pass. At All Saints’ we continue to contribute in tangible ways to the reality of belonging to a worldwide communion that we understand most in terms of relationship. We support the Compass Rose Society http://www.compassrosesociety.org/
And I have just accepted appointment to the board which supports the Anglican Observer to the United Nations http://www.anglicancommunion.org/un/
While I applaud the programmatic concerns of the office, what really excites me about that work is that we are providing a voice for the poor in the councils of the United Nations. All too often the poor are not well represented by their governments, and a voice of a Church that recognizes the generous, abundant grace of God and the special concern of Jesus for the poor can only be a good thing. We continue our informal relationship with the Diocese of Western Tanganyika in
At the same time it is around the Lord’s Table that the Catholicity of the Church is most manifest, not in some ecclesiastic form of supra-national Corporation. We will gather this Christmas as we have always done. This year we will do so in the midst of a recession, wondering how to be faithful with the gifts that are released for the work we have been given to do and making sure that we do not reduce our work with the neediest among us. In fact I hope that we may be able to expand that work in time of need. That would be something to celebrate.
2 comments:
Our world needs communion now just as much as it ever has. It saddens me that those who have theological disagreements with parishes such as ours would go so far as to tell us that they no longer wish to share a table with us (or with those who they wish to marginalize, which is related, but, in a way, a separate issue). No one is asking for an agreement on theology to be made today or tomorrow. Only communion and communication. When have these things ever been harmful?
All four instruments of the unity of the Anglican Communion have said that blessing same-sex unions is not something that we as a communion of churches can embrace at this time. The Anglican Church of Canada (ACC) and TEC have decided to go their own way on this issue.
But imagine a congregation of 40 members voting 38 to 2 not to tear down the church and build a new one. And then imagine the 2 who voted lost the vote going ahead with with their innovation anyway. Who are the schismatics?
When the ACC/TEC were pleaded with to not go ahead with blessing same-sex unions, and with consecrating a gay bishop, they were warned that to do so would be to "tear the fabric of the communion." Who can argue that this is anything but a polite reference to schismatic behavior. Tearing = schism. But ACC/TEC didn't care and went ahead doing their own thing (even though as you said, the communion is based on relationship. As someone who has interacted with global south Anglicans, do you have any idea of how hurtful the behaviour of ACC/TEC is? The people I know are not filled with moral outrage, they are hurt in their hearts by what feels like relational betrayal. To be called a schismatic is like putting salt in the wound.
Post a Comment